As a contribution to this edition of the Accretionary Wedge, I’d like to scrape off the following: The hemispherical dichotomy and the idea of ancient Martian plate tectonics make me go hmmm….
This is a topographic map of Mars created using data from the NASA Mars Orbital Laser Altimeter (MOLA). The dark blues and cool colors represent topographic lows; the reds and warm colors represent topographic highs. The ‘hemispherical dichotomy’ refers to the difference between the topography of the northern 1/3 of the planet and the southern 2/3 of the planet. The northern hemisphere of Mars sits approximately 2-3 km topographically lower than the southern hemisphere, and the south pole is estimated to be ~6 km higher than the north pole.
In addition, the surface geology of each hemisphere is radically different. Craters and terrain heavily mark the southern hemisphere, but the northern lowlands are relatively smooth and flat. If crater density is used as an indicator of absolute age (i.e., crater counts), then the southern hemisphere may be ancient crust formed during the accretion of Mars and the northern hemisphere may be much younger.
It’s generally agreed that Mars lacks a self-sustaining magnetic field and is not tectonically active, BUT… did plate tectonic processes operate on Mars in the past? I submit, for your enjoyment and wonder (hmmm…) the following observations:
1.) The Martian surface is characterized by both extensional features (e.g., grabens and rifts) and contractional features (e.g., wrinkle ridges), but evidence of strike-slip movement is rare. To the right is a photo of a heart-shaped graben taken by the Mars Global Surveyor Orbital Camera. Are these types of features telling us something about Martian tectonic history?
2.) Numerous volcanic features on the Martian surface span a wide range of geologic ages, which are estimated using cross-cutting relationships and crater counts. Studies of the Tharsis region, a volcanic plateau with several shield volcanoes, provide information on the petrology and structure of the Martian interior. For example, Olympus Mons (photo below), a shield volcano twice the size of Mauna Loa in Hawaii is characterized by ancient voluminous basalt flows. What does this type of feature imply about isostatic compensation and the interior structure of Mars? 
3.) Finally, the Mars Global Surveyor made repeated low-altitude passes through the martian atmosphere to circularize the spacecraft’s orbit using atmospheric drag. Magnetic data was collected every time the spacecraft dropped below 200km; the closest approach was at 101km. From this data, Connerney et al. (1999) present a martian magnetic field map.
Red and blue coloring represent positive and negative radial field measurements, and correlation between adjacent MGS tracks is possible. Are these magnetic stripes on the martian crust? Are martian anomalies a result of tectonism?
Hmmm…
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Ancient plate tectonics on Mars? Hmmm...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
I always thought the argument that the "stripes" were like Earth's was stretching things (and not in that way either). But then I can be a stick-in-the-mud.
There's an article in the 2007 Annual Reviews on the dichotomy that you would enjoy.
Mars is going to be such a planetary geologist's dream once we get there and start stomping around.
In regards to the North-South absolute age by way of impact craters; There was an an article published in Nature last year called "Mars at the Tipping Point" (first result in google). The paper showed strong evidence for an ocean in the northern hemisphere and a changing shoreline (by ~1 Km in height), as the Tharsis volcanics formed.
The hypothesis is that the Tharsis region was not erupted at the rotational equator as it is now located, but slightly oblique to it. The enormous amount of mass expelled onto the martian surface realigned the axis of rotation, and like a bathtub being tilted, changed the waterline of the northern ocean (there's two major palaeo-shorelines in the north separated by 1 Km in elevation).
So, it's not that the north is younger, but that its been smoothed out by marine processing. But this hemisphere elevation dichotomy is still a "Hmmm", and having an ocean on Mars is also a "Hmmm", mostly because it would have to have been a stable ocean, existing pre, sync and post Tharsis formation.
Awesome article.
Andrew, I agree. The fact that there aren't discrete spreading ridges or transforms makes me go 'hmmm' all the more! Chuck also recommended the 2007 article, and it turns out that Chris recently blogged about it. Good stuff!
Yorrike, thanks for the reference. The idea that the northern hemisphere could have been shaped by marine processes makes me go 'Hmmm...' and then 'Oooo...that's neat'!
No, I'm talking about the review article on the Martian hemispheric dichotomy in the 2007 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, "Hemispheres Apart: The Crustal Dichotomy on Mars" by Watters, McGovern and Irwin.
Oh, oops... should've caught that. Thanks for clarifying.
Jeannette - I would have thought you would have been hmm-ing about the mudball paper.
Post a Comment